Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 126
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 35(4): 558-562, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38181971

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine if symptom relief with celiac plexus block (CPB) is associated with favorable clinical outcomes after median arcuate ligament release (MALR) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from January 2000 to December 2021. Fifty-seven patients (42 women, 15 men; mean age, 43 years [range, 18-84 years]) with clinical and radiographic features suggestive of median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous CPB for suspected MALS. Clinical outcomes of CPB and MALR surgery were correlated. Adverse events were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines. RESULTS: CT-guided percutaneous CPB was successfully performed in all 57 (100%) patients with suspected MALS. A cohort of 38 (67%) patients showed clinical improvement with CPB. A subset of 28 (74%) patients in this group subsequently underwent open MALR surgery; 27 (96%) responders to CPB showed favorable clinical outcomes with surgery. There was 1 (4%) CPB-related mild adverse event. There were no moderate, severe, or life-threatening adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who responded to CPB were selected to undergo surgery, and 96% of them improved after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Plexo Celíaco , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Arteria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Plexo Celíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio/cirugía , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio/complicaciones , Ligamentos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ligamentos/cirugía
2.
Mymensingh Med J ; 32(1): 90-95, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36594307

RESUMEN

Control of pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis is difficult because 30.0% to 50.0% of patients still experience persistence or recurrence of pain even after surgery. So a combined approach of surgery and coeliac plexus neurolysis was carried out in this study to see the relief of pain and reduce the requirement of analgesics in these patients. This prospective observational comparative study was carried out in the Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from November 2017 to October 2018. Forty one (41) study participants with the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis were included consecutively in this study. The participants were divided into two groups. Group I (n=18) underwent pancreatic surgery with coeliac plexus neurolysis by infiltration of 20ml of 100% alcohol in the loose areolar tissue 10ml each into right and left para-aortic space at the level of coeliac trunk and Group II (n=23) underwent pancreatic surgery only. Participants' preoperative data were collected from patient record file. Number, frequency and intensity of pain and requirement of amount of analgesics for the last 3 months were recorded from patients' history. The intensity of pain was categorized by visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively. The participants of both groups were followed up at 1, 2 and 3 months interval and asked for disappearance or reduction of pain, frequency of attack and requirement of analgesics. Again visual analog scale was used for categorization of pain. Pain free period was recorded after the end of follow up period. Pain reduction occurred after surgery in both groups. But when pain relief was compared on the basis of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), it was significantly better in Group I after 1 month of surgery than Group II (p=0.05). But 2 and 3 months after surgery this difference became insignificant (p=0.246 and 0.264). No statistical difference was found in terms of analgesic usage, severe acute attack or hospital admission (p=0.511, 0.439 and 0.495) at the end of 3 months follow up. Participants in Group I had significantly longer pain free period than Group II (p=0.025). Regarding complications, postural hypotension developed in 5.6% (1) patients. Diarrhea developed in 11.1% (2) patients in Group I and wound infection developed in 2 patients in each groups respectively. No patients developed any major complications like anastomotic leakage, deep or organ or space infection. Intraoperative coeliac plexus neurolysis reduces pain immediately after surgery and provides longer pain free period in patients with chronic pancreatitis after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Plexo Celíaco , Pancreatitis Crónica , Humanos , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Bangladesh , Pancreatitis Crónica/complicaciones , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología
3.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 29(1): 245-251, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36239570

RESUMEN

Context: Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) at a late stage often suffer from severe abdominal pain due to the invasion of celiac plexus, and the analgesics they receive often have intolerable side effects. Endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-guided CPN) can have a good therapeutic effect. Objective: The study intended to evaluate the ability of two nursing cooperation patterns to reduce patients' pain, decrease operation times, increase operational efficiency, and increase nurses' satisfaction, for patients with advanced PC and abdominal pain who received EUS-guided CPN. Design: The research team designed a retrospective controlled study. Setting: The study took place at the Shenzhen People's Hospital of the Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University in Shenzhen, China, and at the Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University in Shanghai, China. Participants: Participants were 40 patients with advanced PC who received EUS-guided CPN at one of the two hospitals between January 2019 and January 2020. Intervention: Twenty participants at Changhai Hospital received the traditional nursing cooperation pattern and became the control group, and 20 participants at the Shenzhen People's Hospital received the new nursing cooperation pattern and became the intervention group. Outcome Measures: The study measured clinical data, nursing measures, diagnostic significance, and key points for the two patterns as well as compared the effects of the new nursing cooperation method to that of traditional nursing. If the measurement data met the requirements for normality, the team used the two independent sample t-test for the intergroup comparisons. If normality wasn't satisfied, the team used medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for expression and the rank sum test for the intergroup comparisons. Counting data were expressed using the constituent ratio, and team used the chi-square test for comparisons between groups. P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The operations were successful, and no complications occurred. No significant difference existed in the pain scores between the control group and the intervention group (P > .05), while a significant difference occurred in the nurses' operation times and satisfaction. Not only were the scores for operation times for the control group (97) and the intervention group (59) significantly different, but also the nurses' satisfaction was significantly higher for the intervention group postintervention, at 83.35 ± 5.25, than for the control group, at 62.25 ± 8.18 (P < .001). Such a new nursing cooperation method could assist in patient's rehabilitation and increase nurses' satisfaction. Conclusions: The new nursing cooperation method for patients with advanced PC and abdominal pain undergoing EUS-guided CPN can reduce operation time and improve nurses' satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Plexo Celíaco , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Plexo Celíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Endosonografía/efectos adversos , Endosonografía/métodos , China , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
4.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) ; 69(2): 71-78, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35183469

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has been used to control pancreatic cancer (PC) pain, up to our knowledge, there is no study compared intraoperative CPN and computed tomography (CT)-guided techniques. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of intraoperative and CT-guided CPN in unresectable PC on pain intensity and analgesic requirements. METHODS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, open label, controlled, non-inferiority study, 20 patients were excluded or lost to follow up. The patients were randomly allocated to either intraoperative or CT-guided CPN group. A mixture of 20 mL ethanol 90%, 100 mg lignocaine and 5 mg dexamethasone was infused on each side of the aorta in both groups. Visual analogue score (VAS) and oral daily tramadol consumption were recorded at day 7, 14, 30, 60, 120 and 180 days after intervention. Occurrence of any intervention related complications were reported. RESULTS: Median VAS was similar in both intraoperative and CT-guided CPN groups from day 7 up to 180 days after intervention. The median daily analgesic consumption of oral tramadol (mg) was comparable in both intraoperative and CT-guided CPN groups after intervention at day 7 (50 versus 50), day14 (50 versus 50), day 30 (50 versus 50), day 60 (50 versus 50), day 120 (100 versus 75) and day 180 (100 versus 100). The incidence of diarrhea, vomiting, hypotension and back pain was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative CPN is non-inferior to CT-guided CPN as both techniques were similarly associated with reduced pain severity and analgesics requirements.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Plexo Celíaco , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tramadol , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Analgésicos , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
6.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 52: 151732, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33798927

RESUMEN

Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS) is a rare entity characterized by severe post-prandial epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, and/or weight loss. Symptoms have been attributed to vascular compression (celiac artery compression syndrome, CACS), but it remains controversial whether they could be secondary to neural compression. Literature review identified rare description of pathologic findings in surgery journals. The clinico-pathologic findings of four MALS patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic surgery in our hospital are described. All our patients were female with a median age of 32.5 (range 25-55 years), and a median BMI of 23.5 kg/m2. They presented with chronic often post-prandial abdominal pain (4/4), nausea (3/4), emesis (2/4), anorexia (1/4), and weight loss (1/4). Two patients had a history of Crohn's disease. At intraoperative exploration, the celiac artery and adjacent nerves and ganglia were encased and partially compressed by fibrotic tissue in each patient. In each case laparoscopic excision of fibrotic tissue, celiac plexus and ligament division and was performed; celiac plexus nerve block was also performed in one patient. After surgical intervention, symptoms improved in three of the patients whose specimens show periganglionic and perineural fibrosis with proliferation of small nerve fibers. Our findings support neurogenic compression as a contributing factor in the development of pain and other MALS symptoms, and favor the use of MALS rather than CACS as diagnostic terminology. To further study the pathogenesis of this unusual syndrome, surgeons should submit all tissues excised during MALS procedures for histopathologic examination.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Celíaca/patología , Plexo Celíaco/patología , Fibrosis/patología , Ganglios Simpáticos/patología , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio/patología , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Femenino , Fibrosis/cirugía , Ganglios Simpáticos/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/etiología , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Periodo Posprandial , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Vómitos/etiología , Pérdida de Peso
7.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(8): 1216-1220, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682710

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze and compare the incidence of diarrhea in patients who underwent cryoablation of the celiac plexus for intractable abdominal pain versus ethanol therapy over a 5-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2014 to August 2019, 83 patients were identified who underwent neurolysis of the celiac plexus for management of intractable abdominal pain by using either cryoablation (n = 39 [59% female; age range, 36-79 years old [average, 60 ± 11 years old]) or alcohol (n = 44 [48% female; age range, 29-76 years old [average, 60 ± 12 years old]). Pain scores and reports of procedure-related complications or side effects, with special attention to diarrhea and/or other gastrointestinal symptoms, were collected from follow-up visits at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-intervention and were compared between groups. RESULTS: The mean time of follow-up was 17.7 days. Four patients who underwent cryoablation developed gastrointestinal symptoms consisting of 2 cases of nausea and vomiting and 2 cases of diarrhea (5.1%). Twelve patients who underwent ethanol ablation developed gastrointestinal symptoms, including 1 case of nausea, 3 cases of vomiting, and 9 cases of diarrhea (20.5%). There was a significantly higher incidence of both diarrhea (chi-squared likelihood ratio, P = .03) and overall gastrointestinal symptoms (chi-squared likelihood ratio, P = .04) in the ethanol group than in the cryoablation group. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation of the celiac plexus may provide a new treatment option for intractable abdominal pain, and it appears to have a lower incidence of diarrhea and fewer gastrointestinal side effects than ablation using ethanol.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Criocirugía , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Dolor Intratable/cirugía , Radiografía Intervencional , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Plexo Celíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Plexo Celíaco/fisiopatología , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Diarrea/epidemiología , Etanol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Intratable/diagnóstico , Dolor Intratable/epidemiología , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 39(2): 171-175, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32065352

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In gallbladder cancer (GBC), nearly 80% of patients present with pain in the upper abdomen. Narcotic analgesics are usually effective in relieving cancer pain, but induce adverse effects. Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is an effective alternative to reduce pain caused by upper abdominal cancer; however, no published data is available on endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) for pain relief in GBC. METHODS: Patient with unresectable GBC with upper abdominal pain of severity ≥ 3 on visual analogue scale (VAS), not responding to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and tramadol were recruited prospectively over a 2-year period. EUS-CPN was done using the central approach in all the patients. Pain severity was assessed using a VAS, prior to EUS-CPN and at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after CPN. RESULTS: The technical success was achieved in 19 of 21 patients in whom the procedure was attempted. There was a significant improvement in pain severity as measured by VAS compared with the baseline at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment (p < .001); at 8 weeks, pain severity was less but was not statistically significant. At week 2, nearly 95% of patients had either complete or partial relief of pain. This response declined to 63% and 61% at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. There was a significant reduction in daily requirement of analgesics in all the patients at 2 and 4 weeks compared with baseline (p < .001); at week 8, there was no significant reduction in analgesic dose. CONCLUSION: EUS-CPN has a high technically success in most patients with GBC. It improved pain in about 60% to 70% patients and lowered daily analgesic dose requirement for up to 4 weeks. There was no procedure-related complication.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Dolor en Cáncer/etiología , Dolor en Cáncer/cirugía , Plexo Celíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Endosonografía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/complicaciones , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Analgésicos , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 15(4): 825-830, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31436238

RESUMEN

AIMS: The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of navigated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) using a 0.4 T open magnetic resonance system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent MRI-guided CPN between January 2013 and October 2017. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by recording the complications, the opioid intake, and questionnaire before the intervention and at the time point of 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months postprocedure using a numerical visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Navigated MRI guidance allowed the precise placement of needle in the targeted area and the visualization of the injected neurolysis agents for all cases. The VAS scores decreased from 8.8 ± 1.0 to 2.9 ± 0.9, 4.2 ± 1.7, and 4.7 ± 1.8 at 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months postprocedure (P < 0.05). This intervention reduced the dosage of opioid consumption 1 month after the procedure (52.3 ± 10.4 mg before the treatment vs. 28.2 ± 4.9 mg after the treatment; P < 0.001). Treatment-related side effects included hematoma in one patient, short episodes of diarrhea in three patients, and hypotension in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: With the assistance of the navigation system, MRI-guided CPN is a safe and effective treatment approach for managing the upper abdominal pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/prevención & control , Dolor en Cáncer/prevención & control , Plexo Celíaco/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/patología , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor en Cáncer/etiología , Dolor en Cáncer/patología , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 29(12): 1639-1644, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414719

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of endovascular denervation (EDN) on abdominal cancer pain relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2017 to February 2018, 7 cancer patients (2 males and 5 females) were enrolled in this study. The diagnoses of the patients included 3 pancreatic cancer, 2 cervical carcinoma, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 esophageal cancer with retroperitoneum lymph nodes invasion. Denervation was carried out at the abdominal aorta close to the origin of celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery with the use of a multielectrode radiofrequency ablation catheter with settings of time 120 seconds and temperature 60°C. The primary end point was improvement in pain scores. The secondary end points included change in quality of life, intake of narcotics, and the safety of EDN. RESULTS: All of the patients experienced pain relief. The pain scores as measured by means of visual analog scores at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the procedure were significantly lower than before the operation (P < .001). A > 4 score reduction was observed in all cases. A significant reduction in narcotics use within 3 months after the operation was also seen. The quality of life scores of the patients improved significantly (P < .005) with better sleep. No severe treatment-related adverse events or major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: EDN is a safe and effective means to alleviate pain caused by cancer and may serve as a new approach for cancer pain relief and palliative care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/terapia , Dolor Abdominal/prevención & control , Desnervación Autonómica/métodos , Ablación por Catéter , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Neoplasias Abdominales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Abdominales/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Aortografía/métodos , Desnervación Autonómica/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor , Cuidados Paliativos , Proyectos Piloto , Datos Preliminares , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(31): e11309, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30075497

RESUMEN

Recently, several reports demonstrated the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment response after NACRT, especially for nerve plexuses, and the optimal resection area for superior mesenteric artery nerve plexuses in BRPC and LAPC patients after NACRT.A total of 17 patients with BRPC and LAPC received preoperative gemcitabine-based NACRT. The numbers of BRPC and LAPC patients were 13 and 4, respectively. We evaluated nerve plexus invasion by CT before and after NACRT, decided on the resection area of plexus invasion in SMA before NACRT, and compared the preoperative evaluation and clinicopathological findings.In the plexus of the supra-mesenteric artery (pl-SMA), arterial nerve plexus invasion, in cases <90°, all patients showed the absence of residual cancer in the resected specimen after NACRT. In cases between 90° and 180°, 1 of 2 patients (50%) showed nerve plexus invasion. In cases over 180°, all patients showed nerve plexus invasion. We could perform R0 resection in all 10 cases, and pl-SMA invasion disappeared in 6 of 7 BRPC patients.We demonstrated the relationship between the angle of nerve plexus tumor invasion and treatment effect after NACRT. We could perform R0 resection in all pl-SMA invasion cases, deciding on the resection area of pl-SMA based on CT before NACRT.


Asunto(s)
Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Disección , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Gemcitabina , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
13.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 36(4): 282-288, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28828591

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An interventional procedure like celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has a significant role in relieving intractable pain in patients with locally advanced abdominal malignancies. Ultrasound (USG) guidance enables performance of bedside CPN by real-time visualization of the needle trajectory. The objective of the study was to perform percutaneous USG-guided CPN and to verify technical outcomes of the procedure using a post-procedure CT scan. METHODS: Eleven eligible patients of advanced upper abdominal malignancies having a pain score of >3/10 on visual analog scale (VAS) were recruited to undergo CPN. A post-procedure CT scan was performed to evaluate technical outcomes of the procedure. Patients were evaluated for pain relief. They were followed up at the 1st, 4th, and 6th weeks after CPN. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent USG-guided CPN. The injected drug was visualized as an echogenic cloud in ultrasound in 7 out of 11 (64%) patients. In the remaining 4 patients, the echogenic cloud was not well formed. In the post-procedure CT scan, the spread of the drug was seen in all 11 patients. This spread was bilaterally symmetrical in 7 (64%) patients and asymmetrical or unilateral in 4 (36%) patients. All patients in the immediate post-procedure period and 91% of the patients during the 1st-, 4th-, and 6th-week follow up had improvement in their pain scores. CONCLUSION: A post-procedure CT scan was useful in verifying the technical outcome of USG-guided CPN in patients with advanced upper abdominal malignancies.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Dolor en Cáncer/cirugía , Plexo Celíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Neoplasias Abdominales/complicaciones , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor en Cáncer/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 34(2): 142-147, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26764345

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, adverse effects, and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) versus traditional medication strategies for the treatment of patients with advanced cancer having severe upper abdominal cancer pain. METHODS: This retrospective study included 81 patients with advanced upper abdominal cancer admitted to The Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University between January 2013 and July 2014. The patients were divided into percutaneous NCPB (treatment) and medication for pain (control) groups. The outcomes were measured in terms of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score before treatment and on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 28th days posttreatment. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the therapy were assessed using analysis of the health economics. RESULTS: The improvements in NRS score (1.42 ± 1.09 vs 4.03 ± 0.96, P < .01) and KPS score (65.55 ± 9.09 vs 63.03 ± 8.961, P < .01) in the treatment group were significantly superior compared to the control group on the 7th day of treatment, followed by no significant difference between the 2 groups on the 14th and the 28th day of treatment. Health economics evaluation revealed that the medicine-specific costs and total health care costs were significantly reduced in the treatment group compared to the control group ( P < .05), but no significant differences between the 2 groups ( P > .05) were seen in the costs of hospitalization, examinations, and treatment. CONCLUSION: The percutaneous NCPB method shows promising results and better cost-effectiveness for treating patients with advanced cancer having severe upper abdominal pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Dolor en Cáncer/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter , Plexo Celíaco , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Abdominal/economía , Dolor Agudo/economía , Dolor Agudo/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor en Cáncer/economía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/economía , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/economía , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
15.
Br J Surg ; 103(8): 941-9, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27304847

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer involving the coeliac axis is considered unresectable by most guidelines, with a median survival of 6-11 months. A subgroup of these patients can undergo distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection, but consensus on the value of this procedure is lacking. The evidence for this procedure, including the impact of preoperative hepatic artery embolization and (neo)adjuvant therapy, was evaluated. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines until 27 May 2015. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included morbidity and radical resection rates. RESULTS: A total of 19 retrospective studies, involving 240 patients, were included. The methodological quality of the studies ranged from poor to moderate. A radical resection was reported in 74·5 per cent (152 of 204), major morbidity in 27 per cent (26 of 96), ischaemic morbidity in 9·0 per cent (21 of 223) and 90-day mortality in 3·5 per cent (4 of 113). Overall, 35·5 per cent of patients (55 of 155) underwent preoperative hepatic artery embolization without an apparent beneficial impact on ischaemic morbidity. Overall, 15·7 per cent (29 of 185) had neoadjuvant and 51·0 per cent (75 of 147) had adjuvant therapy. There was a difference in survival between patient series where less than half of patients had (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and series where more than half were receiving this treatment: case-weighted median overall survival was 16 (range 9-48) versus 18 (10-26) months respectively (P = 0·002). Overall median survival for the whole study population was 14·4 (range 9-48) months. CONCLUSION: Distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection seems a valuable option for selected patients with pancreatic cancer involving the coeliac axis with acceptable morbidity and mortality, and a median survival of 18 months when combined with (neo)adjuvant therapy.


Asunto(s)
Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Embolización Terapéutica , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad
16.
ANZ J Surg ; 86(10): 756-761, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27111447

RESUMEN

Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumour with very poor prognosis and a chance for 5-year survival is approximately 6%. One of the main symptoms of this neoplasm is pain, mostly of neuropathic origin, which significantly decreases the quality of life and impairs the functional activity of patients. The most common treatment of pain in pancreatic cancer is conservative therapy which is based on analgesic ladder rules established by the World Health Organization. Unfortunately, it is not always effective and it has many side effects that also can diminish patients' quality of life. Invasive treatment of pain in pancreatic cancer includes mainly coeliac plexus block and sympathectomy, and both of them significantly reduce levels of pain and help to improve the quality of life. It is postulated that the place of those two invasive methods should not be at the final stage of treatment, but they can provide significantly better improvement of pain once instituted earlier (such as the first or second step of analgesic World Health Organization's ladder). The aim of this article is to review and assess the conservative as well as the invasive therapy in the management of pain in pancreatic cancer. It also presents brief insight into non-medical methods of pain reduction, which can be supplementary to conservative and/or invasive treatment.


Asunto(s)
Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor/etiología , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Terapias Complementarias , Humanos , Bloqueo Nervioso , Simpatectomía
17.
J Palliat Med ; 19(1): 83-6, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26381724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neurolytic celiac plexus block is increasingly used to treat refractory pain associated with abdominal malignancies, especially pancreatic cancer. While self-limiting diarrhea can occur commonly in patients post procedure, a very rare risk of persistent diarrhea exists. OBJECTIVE: We present a case of a 70 year old female with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who was hospitalized for persistent severe diarrhea post celiac plexus block and discuss management options for this adverse effect. DESIGN: A review of the current literature within the past 20 years (PubMed and Ovid databases) was conducted to discuss alternatives of management. MEASUREMENTS/RESULTS: Ninety-three entries were found in total including duplicates and only two were included for relevance. Management options that were discussed included anti-motility agents, alpha-adrenergic agonists, and somastatin analog (octreotide). Our patient was initially treated with loperamide, hyoscine, psyllium, and cholestyramine before responding to octreotide. The patient was discharged on long-acting octreotide after her bowel routine stabilized. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent diarrhea is a very rare complication of celiac plexus block and current literature regarding proper management is based largely on anecdotal evidence. For this patient octreotide was an effective agent for the management of this complication.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/complicaciones , Antidiarreicos/uso terapéutico , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Octreótido/uso terapéutico , Dolor Intratable/etiología , Dolor Intratable/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Adenocarcinoma/fisiopatología , Anciano , Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
HPB (Oxford) ; 17(9): 777-84, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26201994

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reported series of a distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) are either small or not adequately controlled. The aim of this analysis was to report a multicentre series of modified Appleby procedures with a comparison group to determine the relative operative risk. METHODS: Data were gathered through the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project. Over 14 months, 822 patients underwent a distal pancreatectomy at 43 institutions. Twenty of these patients (2.4%) also underwent a celiac axis resection. DP-CAR patients were matched by age, gender, BMI, serum albumin, ASA class, gland texture, duct size and pathology to 172 patients undergoing DP alone. RESULTS: The majority of DP and DP-CAR patients had adenocarcinomas (61% and 60%). The median operative time for a DP alone was shorter than for a DP-CAR (207 versus 276 min, P < 0.01). Post-operative acute kidney injury (1% versus 10%, P < 0.03) and 30-day mortality were higher after a DP-CAR (1% versus 10%, P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: A distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection is associated with increased operative time, post-operative acute kidney injury and a 10% operative mortality. The decision to offer a modified Appleby procedure for a body of pancreas tumour should be made with full disclosure of the increased risks.


Asunto(s)
Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 62(138): 455-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25916081

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Advanced pancreatic body carcinoma frequently accompany extra-pancreatic nerve plexus (PL) invasion, one of the poor indicator of patient prognosis. The present study aimed to reveal the progress of the PL invasion from cancer of the pancreas body toward the root of the celiac artery (CA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) followed by investigation of the relevance of diagnostic accuracy. METHODOLOGY: Resected specimens from 50 consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) were pathologically analyzed for the direction of PL invasion. Diagnostic accuracy on CT imaging were also investigated. RESULTS: Thirty seven of the 50 patients (74%) were positive for PL invasion around the CHA, SPA, CA and SMA. In terms of the diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive values for the PL invasion were 35%, 36%, 43% and 81% for the SPA, CHA, CA and SMA, respectively. Among 21 patients and 23 patients with PL invasion around CHA and SPA, 13 and 6 patients also accompanied PL invasion around CA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Carcinoma of the pancreatic body is found to frequently accompany PL invasion around CA. Under the limitation of low diagnostic accuracy, DP-CAR might be feasible operation that increases the possibility of R0 resection.


Asunto(s)
Desnervación Autonómica , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Plexo Celíaco/patología , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Celíaca/patología , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Plexo Celíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/patología , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Invasividad Neoplásica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 176(50)2014 Dec 08.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25498187

RESUMEN

Pain is among the most common symptoms in patients with pancreatic cancer and up to 80% require analgesics, most often as opioids. Unfortunately the analgesic effect is frequently insufficient, and increasing doses are required, resulting in unpleasant side effects. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided neurolysis is a well established method to alleviate or reduce pain due to pancreatic cancer with a documented effect in 80% of patients. The aim of this review is to draw attention to endoscopic ultrasound-guided neurolysis and to discuss its potential which may not be fully utilized.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/terapia , Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo/métodos , Plexo Celíaco/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Plexo Celíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Endosonografía/métodos , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...